How Vera learns

Engineered, not prompted.

Most AI writing is prompting: write instructions, see what comes back, then fix it by hand. Vera treats your voice the way engineers treat software. It's specified, tested, measured and versioned. This page is the detail behind the homepage.

Promptinginstructions → generate → rewrite by hand
Veraspec → test → measure → improve ↺
← Back to the homepage
The principles

Your voice, treated like software.

Spec

Your voice has a spec.

Your rules aren't suggestions in a prompt. Every draft is checked against them before anyone sees it, the way code is tested before it ships.

Objective

It optimizes a number, not a feeling.

One goal you can measure: how much of each draft you have to change, and how close it sits to your measured voice. Every improvement is judged by whether that number goes down.

Tested

Nothing changes without proof.

Before Vera changes how it writes for you, the new version is tested against posts you've already approved. If it doesn't beat the current version, it doesn't go live.

Versioned

Every version is saved.

Every version of how Vera writes for you is saved and scored. If something drifts, it rolls back to the last version that sounded like you.

Model-proof

Built to outlast the model.

When the underlying AI models change, your voice can be re-tested against your own posts, not rewritten from scratch.

Result

Drafts that start closer to you every week.

Measured on every post: see the numbers below.

Inside the optimizer

Every post you approve becomes part of an answer key.

The optimizer's job is to find the writing instructions and examples that reproduce your approved posts with the fewest edits.

  1. Score every draft. How much of it you kept, whether it passed your rules, how closely it matches your measured voice, and how many of your own lines it kept.
  2. Learn from what you approved. Your approved and published posts, plus writing you've given Vera in your own words, are the right answers. The optimizer turns what they have in common into new instructions and examples.
  3. Challenger vs champion. Each new version (the challenger) is tested against the current one (the champion) on posts of yours it hasn't seen.
  4. Adopt only on evidence. A challenger replaces the champion only if it wins by a clear margin across enough of your decisions. Otherwise it's thrown away, so your voice never drifts on noise.
Champion vs challengerillustrative
● adopted   ● discardedscore on your unseen posts
What we measure

The system measures itself on every post.

Vera compares each draft with what you actually publish. All three numbers should fall as it learns you.

Edits per post
2.4
↓ 73% since week 1 · lower is better

Changes you made to a draft before posting it.

Share of each post changed
8%
↓ 81% since week 1 · lower is better

Average share of each post you changed before publishing it.

Cost per run
$0.27
↓ 36% since week 1 · lower is better

AI cost to turn one idea into drafts for every channel.

Example monthly report · illustrative data, not client results.

Roadmap

From better instructions to a model trained on you.

Today Vera adapts by improving its instructions and examples from your decisions. Once there's enough of your own writing, the plan is to fine-tune a model on it.

Four steps: your rules and onboarding writing from day one; examples from your posts at about 6 posts; prompt optimization at about 12 to 30 posts; fine-tuning at about 100 posts DAY 1~6 POSTS ~12–30 POSTS100+ POSTS Your rules + profile Your posts as guides Prompt optimization Fine-tuned on you from your onboarding writing the best ones guide each draft the prompt rewrites itself,tested on your edits your rhythm built intothe model itself DAY 1~6 POSTS ~12–30 POSTS100+ POSTS Your rules + profile Your posts as guides Prompt optimization Fine-tuned on you from your onboarding writing the best ones guide each draft rewrites itself, tested on your edits your rhythm built into the model
Post counts are per channel and approximate
Request access →